Observing Argumentation

Argumentation In the 21st century, tidy sum atomic number 18 very stupefy in the sterile thoughts that society implants in their heads. many people dont like to step stunned of their comfort zone when it comes to values and stereotypes. In both stories, I personally think of the theme is that everyone should step out of the thoughts that they are used to and be more open-minded roughly the world.In Fatima Merrills article Digital Scheherazade The stick up of Women as Key Players In the Arab disconnect Communication Strategies she Is ring divert the concern of Spanish reporters a centering from the stereotypical mental capacity that the Arab world just consists of terrorism and women in veils. jocosity is trying to get the reporters to steering on the positives of the Arab world and give women the ascribe that they deserve. In Richard Rodriguez twaddle Family Values the germ is trying to emphasize what family values rightfully means and the open-mindedness of having a g ay family member.Within dissimilar civilizations thither are deferent standards, expectations and reactions, still In the windup It Is all about(predicate) acceptance and looking beyond the usance you are used to. Fatima merriness uses facts and statistics to sort her story about how the digital transformation, called lucerne racial, has been a big influence in the Arab states. Merriness tries to inform the referee on how ignorant the outside world is towards the ingenuousness of the Arab community. Some citizens look at the r growing as something to be worried about when their kids are sitting at home, honoring videos that they dont mind appropriate.All they want to do is get under ones skin a way to ban it, when there are actually many upsides. Merriness uses real life examples, such as Maim Al-Kalmia, to emphasize how women are pickings advantage of the advance in technology. She relates the story to her personal experience in Spain and how they didnt swallow a TV t hat featured the chronic channels she would watch at home. Merriness shows how the Spanish reporters are Ignorant to the domain of the Arab world because of stereotypes, besides also because of neglect of knowledge.In Richard Rodriguez story Family values he focuses on the meaning of family values and how it is different in every culture. He uses stories to be able to explain himself and get his point across. American culture is defined as being very independent in the way children are raised, Asian culture is set forth as the whiz kids and Hispanic culture is described as the people of family. thither are stereotypes for every culture and that Is why Rodriguez explains that there Is not one set deflation for family values.When speaking of the gay culture, Rodriguez opens up bout his personal experiences and how gays are spurned in this world. He tries to explain the interior(a) workings of each cultures family values, but ends with the statement that family values are acce ptance. stack need to step out of the stereotypes in the world and accept the change that is occurring most them. While both authors try to move open-mindedness and acceptance throughout their stories, I view that Merriness did a better gambol getting her point across. Hill in Merriments story she uses her personal experience, statistics and facts to inform the lecturer of her argument. It was easier to understand what she was trying to convey with her piece. In my opinion it was more of a hearty forward piece that doesnt leave the reader thinking what is she trying to say? . She started with the reporters stereotypical mindset of the Arab world, went on to describe the evolution of Arab women and ended with how the outside world necessarily to focus on the advancement in technology. Her argument is clear from beginning to end and there is never any confusion.